datavow.com - Documents

1) Introduction
- 1) Purpose
- 2) Requirements
- 3) Terminology
- 4) Overall Operation
2) Notational Conventions and Generic Grammar
- 1) Augmented BNF
- 2) Basic Rules
3) Protocol Parameters
- 1) HTTP Version
- 2) Uniform Resource Identifiers
- 3) Date/Time Formats
  - 1) Full Date
  - 2) Delta Seconds
- 4) Character Sets
  - 1) Missing Charset
- 5) Content Codings
- 6) Transfer Codings
  - 1) Chunked Transfer Coding
- 7) Media Types
  - 1) Canonicalization and Text Defaults
  - 2) Multipart Types
- 8) Product Tokens
- 9) Quality Values
- 10) Language Tags
- 11) Entity Tags
- 12) Range Units
4) HTTP Message
- 1) Message Types
- 2) Message Headers
- 3) Message Body
- 4) Message Length
- 5) General Header Fields
5) Request
- 1) Request-Line
  - 1) Method
  - 2) Request-URI
- 2) The Resource Identified by a Request
- 3) Request Header Fields
6) Response
- 1) Status-Line
  - 1) Status Code and Reason Phrase
- 2) Response Header Fields
7) Entity
- 1) Entity Header Fields
- 2) Entity Body
  - 1) Type
  - 2) Entity Length
8) Connections
- 1) Persistent Connections
- 2) Message Transmission Requirements
9) Method Definitions
- 1) Safe and Idempotent Methods
  - 1) Safe Methods
  - 2) Idempotent Methods
- 2) OPTIONS
- 3) GET
- 4) HEAD
- 5) POST
- 6) PUT
- 7) DELETE
- 8) TRACE
- 9) CONNECT
10) Status Code Definitions
- 1) Informational 1xx
  - 1) Continue
  - 2) Switching Protocols
- 2) Successful 2xx
- 3) Redirection 3xx
- 4) Client Error 4xx
- 5) Server Error 5xx
11) Access Authentication
12) Content Negotiation
- 1) Server-driven Negotiation
- 2) Agent-driven Negotiation
- 3) Transparent Negotiation
13) Caching in HTTP
- 1) ..
- 2) Expiration Model
- 3) Validation Model
- 4) Response Cacheability
- 5) Constructing Responses From Caches
- 6) Caching Negotiated Responses
- 7) Shared and Non-Shared Caches
- 8) Errors or Incomplete Response Cache Behavior
- 9) Side Effects of GET and HEAD
- 10) Invalidation After Updates or Deletions
- 11) Write-Through Mandatory
- 12) Cache Replacement
- 13) History Lists
14) Header Field Definitions
- 1) Accept
- 2) Accept-Charset
- 3) Accept-Encoding
- 4) Accept-Language
- 5) Accept-Ranges
- 6) Age
- 7) Allow
- 8) Authorization
- 9) Cache-Control
  - 1) What is Cacheable
  - 2) What May be Stored by Caches
  - 3) Modifications of the Basic Expiration Mechanism
  - 4) Cache Revalidation and Reload Controls
  - 5) No-Transform Directive
  - 6) Cache Control Extensions
- 10) Connection
- 11) Content-Encoding
- 12) Content-Language
- 13) Content-Length
- 14) Content-Location
- 15) Content-MD5
- 16) Content-Range
- 17) Content-Type
- 18) Date
  - 1) Clockless Origin Server Operation
- 19) ETag
- 20) Expect
- 21) Expires
- 22) From
- 23) Host
- 24) If-Match
- 25) If-Modified-Since
- 26) If-None-Match
- 27) If-Range
- 28) If-Unmodified-Since
- 29) Last-Modified
- 30) Location
- 31) Max-Forwards
- 32) Pragma
- 33) Proxy-Authenticate
- 34) Proxy-Authorization
- 35) Range
  - 1) Byte Ranges
  - 2) Range Retrieval Requests
- 36) Referer
- 37) Retry-After
- 38) Server
- 39) TE
- 40) Trailer
- 41) Transfer-Encoding
- 42) Upgrade
- 43) User-Agent
- 44) Vary
- 45) Via
- 46) Warning
- 47) WWW-Authenticate
15) Security Considerations
- 1) Personal Information
- 2) Attacks Based On File and Path Names
- 3) DNS Spoofing
- 4) Location Headers and Spoofing
- 5) Content-Disposition Issues
- 6) Authentication Credentials and Idle Clients
- 7) Proxies and Caching
  - 1) Denial of Service Attacks on Proxies
16) Acknowledgments
17) References
18) Authors' Addresses
19) Appendices
- 1) Internet Media Type message/http and application/http
- 2) Internet Media Type multipart/byteranges
- 3) Tolerant Applications
- 4) Differences Between HTTP Entities and RFC 2045 Entities
- 5) Additional Features
  - 1) Content-Disposition
- 6) Compatibility with Previous Versions
20) Index
21) Full Copyright Statement
22) Acknowledgement

19.5 Additional Features

RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 document protocol elements used by some existing HTTP implementations, but not consistently and correctly across most HTTP/1.1 applications. Implementors are advised to be aware of these features, but cannot rely upon their presence in, or interoperability with, other HTTP/1.1 applications. Some of these describe proposed experimental features, and some describe features that experimental deployment found lacking that are now addressed in the base HTTP/1.1 specification.

A number of other headers, such as Content-Disposition and Title, from SMTP and MIME are also often implemented (see RFC 2076 [37]).

19.5.1 Content-Disposition

The Content-Disposition response-header field has been proposed as a means for the origin server to suggest a default filename if the user requests that the content is saved to a file. This usage is derived from the definition of Content-Disposition in RFC 1806 [35].

content-disposition =	"Content-Disposition" ":"
	disposition-type *( ";" disposition-parm )
disposition-type =	"attachment" \| disp-extension-token
disposition-parm =	filename-parm \| disp-extension-parm
filename-parm =	"filename" "=" quoted-string
disp-extension-token =	token
disp-extension-parm =	token "=" ( token \| quoted-string )

An example is

Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="fname.ext"

The receiving user agent SHOULD NOT respect any directory path information present in the filename-parm parameter, which is the only parameter believed to apply to HTTP implementations at this time. The filename SHOULD be treated as a terminal component only.

If this header is used in a response with the application/octet- stream content-type, the implied suggestion is that the user agent should not display the response, but directly enter a `save response as...' dialog.

See Section 15.5 for Content-Disposition security issues.